SONU ALIAS VIJAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/6683/2025 · 2025-08-20
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158048 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158048 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48820 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6683 of 2025 Applicant :- Sonu Alias Vijay Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Singh,Ajay Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S.,2023, has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 03-01-2009 passed by the Civil Judge, (Jr.Division)/FTC, S.D.-Ist, Sultanpur in Criminal Case No. 3439 of 2023"State Vs Rajesh Kumar Pandey & Others" arising out of Case Crime No. 91 of 1997, under sections 392, 411 of I.P.C., Police Station-Jaisinghapur, District-Sultanpur, whereby the non-bailable warrant as well as the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 3439 of 2023"State Vs Rajesh Kumar Pandey & Others"under sections 392, 411 of I.P.C., pending before the court of Civil Judge (Jr.Div.)/F.T.C., S.D.- Ist, Sultanpur.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present
applicant
due
to
unavoidable circumstances could not appear before the court and thereafter, Non Bailable Warrant was issued against the applicant on 03-01-2009, which is also under challenge in this application. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the contention aforesaid and submits that the applicant is using the delay-dallying tactics in the matter and as such, the applicant is not entitled for any relief. In rejoinder, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the interest of justice would be sub- served if the present applicant is permitted to surrender before the court concerned and may file
bail application and the same may be directed to be considered within the stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel further undertakes that the applicant will appear before the court below within a period of two weeks. The counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions abovesaid. For the period of two weeks only, the non-bailable warrant issued against the applicant shall remain stayed. However, if the applicant does not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period and does not cooperate with the trial proceedings, this
order shall stand revoked and no benefit of this
order shall accrue to him. The application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.8.2025 AKS Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench