Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15804 (PNJ)

NIRJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/737/2025 · 2025-04-29

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA NIRJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: None Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. In compliance of the order passed by this Court on 24.01.2025, reply by way of an affidavit of Randhir Singh, HPS, Police, Ladwa, Kurukshetra same is taken on record. 2. Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that neither the petitioners nor their 3. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. April 29, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH NIRJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER V/S HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR None for the petitioners. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) In compliance of the order passed by this Court on 24.01.2025, reply by way of an affidavit of Randhir Singh, HPS, Police, Ladwa, Kurukshetra filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. same is taken on record. Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that neither the ioners nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-737-2025 Date of decision: 29.04.2025 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana. In compliance of the order passed by this Court on 24.01.2025, reply by way of an affidavit of Randhir Singh, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. The Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that neither the counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.04.30 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment