Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15804 (PAT)

Braj Nandan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/9813/2016 · 2025-06-24

Anshuman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9813 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.1. Niranjan Kumar Son of Late Brajnandan Prasad Singh A-2, Professor Colony, Adarsh Path, road No. 4-A North Shastri nagar, P.S. - Shastri Nagar District- Patna, Bihar - 800023. 1.2. Citranjan Kumar Singh Son of Late Brajnandan Prasad Singh, A-2, Professor Colony, Adarsh Path, road No. 4-A North Shastri nagar, P.S. - Shastri Nagar District- Patna, Bihar - 800023. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Collector of the District-Patna. 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Patna. 3. The Block Development Officer, Danapur, Patna. 4. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sunil Prasad, Advocate For the State : Ms. Dimpal Kumari, AC to GP-11 For the AG : Mr. Ram Kinkar Choubey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 9 24-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief/s:- “I. For grant of 2nd A.C.P with 6th revised pay scale and fixed pension thereon and also to pay dearness allowances for the period July, 2003 to December, 2003. II. For any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner is legally entitled.” Patna High Court CWJC No.9813 of 2016(9) dt.24-06-2025 2/2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the writ petition, payment of 2nd A.C.P has been made, but he submits that interest of the same has not been paid. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is no statutory interest payable on the 2nd A.C.P. 5. In the light of the submissions made, particularly that during pendency of the writ petition, petitioner has received the 2nd A.C.P. Therefore, this writ petition is hereby dismissed as grievance of the petitioners has already been settled. Divyansh/- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U