2025:JHHC:14682 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4564 of 2025 ---- Raj Kumar, aged about 54 years, son of Late Shiv Prasad Sahu, resident of Ekkouri Babu Lane, Tharpakhna, P.O. GOP Ranchi, P.S.-Lower Bazar, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nikhilesh Kr. Chatterjee, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 05th June, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant who is in custody since 02.05.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.109 of 2025, registered for the offences under Section 304(2), 74, 78 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no criminal antecedent against him and on the confession of the co-accused his name has been surfaced in this case. Further, undertaking has been given by him for participation in the trial and he is ready to abide by every condition imposed as by this Court. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case that there is criminal antecedent, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.109 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amar/- Uploaded