M/S BOGIDHOLA TEA AND TRADING CO (P) COMPANY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
WP(C)/4531/2020 · 2025-06-08
Michael Zothankhuma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15799 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15799 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010152412020
2025:GAU-AS:7464
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4531/2020 M/S BOGIDHOLA TEA AND TRADING CO (P) COMPANY A COMPANY REGD. AND INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT BOGIDHOLA T.E., LETEKUJAN-785613, ASSAM AND ITS ADMINISTRATIVE HEAD OFFICE AT PARAG BHAWAN, 4TH FLOOR, ULUBARI, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-781007, ASSAM AND IS REP.
BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED MANAGER HO, SRI SAILENDRA SINGH. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FOREST DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI.
2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST ARANYA BHAWAN PANJABARI GUWAHATI-781037 ASSAM.
3:DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER OFFICE OF THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER JONAKINAGAR GULAGHAT-785621 ASSAM.
4:ABDUL HASMAT S/O MD. ABDUL WAHID R/O KEYAPATTI WARD NO. 1 P.O- GOLAGHAT MOUZA- MOUKHOWA UNDER P.S - GOLAGHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G N SAHEWALLA, MR. A CHETIA,MR. M SAHEWALLA,MS. S. TODI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, MR. A I Ali (R-4),MS. N UPADHYAY (R-4),MR D BARUAH (R-4)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 09.06.2025 Heard Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. R. Gogoi, learned counsel for the Forest Department as well as Ms. N. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the Forest Department having permitted the collection/mining of sand from the river running though the petitioner’s patta land.
3. Mr. R. R. Gogoi, learned counsel for the Forest Department submits that the validity of the mining permit/licence that had been granted to the respondent No. 4, expired on 26.05.2022 and as on date, no mining activity is going on in the river which is flowing through the land of the petitioner. As such, the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Ms. N. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 also makes the same submission.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsels for the parties, this writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
6. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant