Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010151632025 2025:GAU-AS:11023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1678/2025 JOYNUDDIN ALIAS JOYEN UDDIN S/O ABDUL MALEK VILL- SATSIA, P.O. JAMADARHAT P.S. FAKIRGANJ, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM,PIN-783330. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL, A A AHMED,MR A ALIM SK,MS. N NASRIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 19-08-2025 Heard Ms. N. Nasrin, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of Page No.# 2/3 State respondent. 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, Joynuddin @ Joyen Uddin in connection with Fakirganj P.S. Case No. 64/2025 (GR No. 893/2025) under Sections 191(2)/190/117(2)/109(1)/324(5) of BNS. 3. Case Diary received. Perused the same. 4. It is submitted by Ms. Nasrin, the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any such offence as alleged in the FIR. However, after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail, he appeared before the I/O, cooperated in the investigation and his statement is also recorded by the I/O. He is still ready and willing to extend his cooperation in the further investigation of the case, if he is granted with the privilege of pre- arrest bail. 5. Mr. Sharma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted in this regard that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the present petitioner and he was also present at the time of the alleged offence. However, the Medical Report of the victim reveals that he sustained simple injuries caused by blunt object. 6. Hearing the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides, considering the conduct of the accused/petitioner and other aspects of the case, I find that custodial interrogation may not be necessary for the purpose of investigation. In view of this the order of interim pre-arrest bail dated Page No.# 3/3 22.07.2025 is hereby made absolute with same terms and conditions. 7. With the above observations, the pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant