NAZMUL NISHA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
CRLP/7579/2025 · 2025-09-10
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7579 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Shri Avneesh Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri G.D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Shikhar Anand, Advocate, who has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 6 and perused the material available on record.
2. By means of present petition, the petitioner has sought following relief:- i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties specially police authorities to take an appropriate decision on the application dated 28.07.2025 by hand and through registered post dated 6.8.2025 moved by the petitioner pending before him forthwith in the interest of justice. ii). issue a writ of Mandamus or appropriate direction for the non- compliance of the mandate under Section 50 Cr.P.C. (now Section 47 of the B.N.S.S., 2023) to that a high-level investigation be conducted into this fake encounter and the abuse of power by police station In-charge Neeraj Yadav and action must be taken against those responsible for shooting the applicant's son in the leg."
3. Shri G.D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. for the State has produced copy of instructions/letter dated 10.09.2025, the same is taken on record.
4. In the aforesaid instructions/letter, it has been indicated that the petitioner Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avneesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Shikhar Anand Nazmul Nisha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
has filed present writ petition on the false and misconceived fact. However, he has having a chequered history of eight criminal cases.
5. Shri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel for respondent no. 6 has also produced a copy of proceedings vide case no. 18050/24/59/2025 wherein the fact has been indicated that Human Right Commission has taken cognizance of the issue and has asked report from the Superintendent of Police, Pratapgarh. The aforesaid instructions are taken on record.
6. In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is consigned to record. September 10, 2025 Virendra CRLP No. 7579 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench