MATA DEEN VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/9171/2025 · 2025-08-18
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157977 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157977 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48143 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9171 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mata Deen Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Pandey,Manoj Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 3.
2. No notice is being issued to the respondents no. 4 & 5 taking into
consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.
4. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired as Assistant Teacher way back in the year 2010 but subsequent thereto, by means of the order dated 01.11.2022, a copy of which is annexure 3 to the writ petition, the District Basic Education Officer, Pratapgarh approved the payment of the promotional pay scale yet the respondents have failed to extend the same to the petitioner till date.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 3 have no objection.
6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.
7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 18.8.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench