Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15797 (KAR)

SRI. MOHAMMED SHABBIR AHMED v. SMT. T S BHAGYALAKSHMI

WP/3031/2025 · 2025-02-03

H T Narendra Prasad

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4813 WP No. 3031 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3031 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. MOHAMMED SHABBIR AHMED S/O MOHAMMED NAZIR AHMED AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.29, 1ST MAIN 3RD CROSS VIVEKANDA COLONY BANASHANAKARI 2ND STAGE KARNATAKA ROAD, BENGALURU -560078 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PARAMESHWARAPPA M V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. T S BHAGYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS W/O VISHWANATHA R/AT NO.20/3, VANIVILAS ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU-560004. 2. SRI. MOHAMMED MANZOOR AHMED S/O MOHAMMED NAZIRE AHMED AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.29, 1ST MAIN 3RD CROSS VIVEKANADA COLONY BANASHAKARI 2ND STAGE KARNATAKA ROAD, BENGALURU-560078 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RAKSHITHA D.J., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORD PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT OF VI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BENGALURU CITY (CCH- Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4813 WP No. 3031 of 2025 11) IN O.S.NO.4451/2020, INCLUDING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 29.1.2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-A FOR VERIFYING THE FACTUAL CORRECTNESS AND LEGALITY OF THE SAME AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the parties submits that O.S.No.4451/2020 on the file of VI Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, itself has been decreed on 01.02.2025. 2. The submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3. In view of the above, prayers sought in the writ petition do not survive for consideration and hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM