2025:UHC:9526-DB HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE MR. G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 2 9 TH OCTOBER, 2 0 2 5 W RI T PETI TI ON ( S/ B) NO. 3 80 OF 2 0 2 5 Aman Gupta …...Petitioner. Ver su s State of Uttarakhand & another …….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, learned counsel. Counsel for the State : Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned Chief Standing Counsel with Mr. Navin Tiwari, learned Brief Holder. Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel. JUDGMENT :(per Mr . G. Nar en dar , C.J.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State and learned counsel for respondent no.2. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the necessary pleadings in support of his case are not completely set out in the petition, and in that view he prays leave to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action with appropriate pleadings. 3. The submission is placed on record. 1 2025:UHC:9526-DB 4. Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action subject to the condition that the petition shall be filed within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, the liberty granted shall stand revoked. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. As a sequel thereto, pending application, if any, shall stand closed. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dated: 29th October, 2025 NI SHANT 2