MAKSUD AHEMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1036/2025 · 2025-08-14
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47704 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1036 of 2025 Applicant :- Maksud Ahemad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sukh Deo Singh,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that anticipatory bail application has become infructuous therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of above, the bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.8.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench