Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15790 (KAR)

SRI M V MURALI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3577/2025 · 2025-02-18

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7239 WP No. 3577 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 3577 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M V MURALI S/O. SRI. M.S. VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A NO. 1494, 17TH A MAIN, JP NAGAR, II PHASE, BANGALORE 560078 2. SRI. TEJASWI S/O. SRI. DURGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/A NO. 31, 4TH CROSS, YELACHENAHALLI, OPP. TO SUPREME OVERSEAS GARMENTS, J. P. NAGAR POST, KANAKPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU 560078 3. SRI. PUTTARAJU M. S/O. LATE. T.P. MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/A NO. B 112, SAHASAGRAND APARTMENTS, CHELEKERE, KALYANNAGAR POST BENGALURU 560043 4. SRI M PAPANNA S/OSRI. MARISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS R/A NO. 13/3, DOOPANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, INDIRANAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560008 5. SMT S VYSHALI W/O SRI CHANDRASHEKAR PACHAYAPPAN Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7239 WP No. 3577 of 2025 D/O SRI S SHIVALINGAM AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS CURRENTLY R/A NO. 75, KALAMBERG LANE, ELLISVILLEMO-63021, CALIFORNIA-91360 REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, SRI S. SHIVALINGAM SO LATE. CV. SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 174/F 2ND MAIN ROAD B BLOCK, AECS LAYOUT, SINGASANDRA BANGALORE 560068 6. SRI T. PRADEEP SO. LATE T. SANKARANARAYANAN AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 41. PRIYA NIVAS, 10TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR, MALLESHAPPA EXTENSION, BENGALURU 560075 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S KALYAN BASAVARAJ., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PARAPPANA AGRAHARA POLICE STATION JAIL ROAD, OPPOSITE HOSA ROAD, SAI SREE LAYOUT, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA, BENGALURU 560100 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7239 WP No. 3577 of 2025 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO EXTEND POLICE PROTECTION IN LIGHT OF THE INJUNCTION ORDERS DTD 08.07.24, ANNX-F TO F5 GRANTED BY HON'BLE III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT ANEKAL, BANGALORE RURAL IN O.S. NO. 94/2020 TO O.S. NO. 99/2020 AS PER THE COMPLAINT DATED 21.12.2024 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONERS AT ANNEXURE A TO A5, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIRCULAR DATED 14.11.2018 BEARING SO. APARADA - 3/105/2018 AT ANNEXURE G AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for both the respondents. 2. The prayer in the writ petition is to direct respondent No.2 - Station House Officer, Parappana Agrahara Police Station to give police protection to the petitioners in the light of the order of temporary injunction granted by the III Additional Civil Judge and CJM, Anekal, in O.S.No.94/2020 to O.S.No.99/2020. 3. This Court has held in many such cases that the person in whose favour an order of injunction has been - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:7239 WP No. 3577 of 2025 granted by a civil court, is required to seek directions for police protection to implement the orders. If such an application is filed by the petitioners before the court where orders of temporary injunction have already been granted, the learned judge may consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. 4. Learned AGA is permitted to file his memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL