APHC010203852020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13304/2020 Between: 1. KOLLA VIJETHA,, W/O. K.NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, HINDU, R/O. DR NO.119, STREET NO.300, NEAR KOTHAPATNAM BUS STAND, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NEAR DIVYA DHABA GARDENS, OPP. SAROVARAM PARK, TAKKELLAPADU VILLAGE, PEDDAKAKANI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. GUDURI VENKATA RAVINDRA KUMAR,, S/O. LATE G.VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O. DR. NO. 6-206 A, POST OFFICE STREET, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( HOME DEPARTMENT ), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. K NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. K.KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. DR NO.119, STREET NO.300, NEAR KOTHAPATNAM BUS STAND, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents No. 2 and 3, who has failed to close the FIR bearing Crime No. 119 / 2020, on the file of II Town Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents No. 2 and 3 to close the FIR bearing Crime No. 119 / 2020, on the file of II Town Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 for not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13304 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents Nos.2 and 3 who has failed to close the FIR bearing Crime No.119/2020 on the file of II Town Police Station Ongole Prakasam District as illegal arbitrary and discriminatory and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents Nos.2 and 3 to close the FIR bearing Crime No.119/2020 on the file of II Town Police Station Ongole Prakasam District and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS