Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157830 (ALL)

CHOTE LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. DEPTT. OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9196/2025 · 2025-08-18

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48129 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9196 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chote Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Deptt. Of Finance And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 to 4. 2. The petition has been filed challenging the provision to the extent that it prescribes a restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules, 1941, as amended by Government Orders and seeks restoration of the commuted pension after the expiry of 10 years and 11 months or, at best, 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in the relevant Government Orders. 3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Writ - A No. 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava and Others v. State of U.P. through Addl. Chief Secy., Deptt. of Finance, Lko and 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025. 4. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally, providing that the petitioner of this writ petition shall also be entitled to the benefit of the judgment rendered in Writ - A No. 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava and Others v. State of U.P. through Addl. Chief Secy., Deptt. of Finance, Lko and 3 Others). Order Date :- 18.8.2025 Shubhankar Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench