Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15783 (RAJ)

PRADEEP @ PINTU MEENA S/O BATTILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5215/2025 · 2025-05-05

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18823] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5215/2025 Pradeep @ Pintu Meena S/o Battilal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bahi Wali Dhani Tan Mandawari, Police Station Mandawari, District Dausa (Raj.). (At Present In District Jail, Dausa). ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Umesh Vyas, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 05/05/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 04.04.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Lalsot, District Dausa in connection with FIR No.131/2024, registered at Police Station Mandawari, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a), 318(4) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66(C) & 66(D) of IT Act, 2000, by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel argues that the charges levelled against the accused-applicant are triable by Judicial Magistrate. Learned counsel also argues that the accused-applicant was arrested on 27.03.2025 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel [2025:RJ-JP:18823] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5215/2025] prays that the investigation and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the fact that charges levelled against the accused- applicant are for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a), 318(4) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66(C) & 66(D) of IT Act, 2000, which are triable by Judicial Magistrate and also considering the fact that the accused-applicant is behind the bars since 27.03.2025 as well as considering the fact that investigation and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant. 6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Pradeep @ Pintu Meena S/o Battilal, arrested in FIR No.131/2024, registered at Police Station Mandawari, District Dausa shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. The Accused-Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /157