\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT o •7\ Or -O' D 1 ^ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO olV SECOND APPEAL NO: 519 OF 2001 Appeal was filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, -C.P.C.') against the Judgment dated 31.01.2001 passed in A.S.No.23 of 1999 (Senior Division) Judge, Kavali 100 of the Code and decree, on the file of learned Civil reversing the judgment and decree, dated 22.11.1999 passed in O.S.No.310 of 1988 on the file of learned Principal Civil (Junior Division) Judge, Kavali. Between: Gudipati Subbaramaiah, S/o. Ramanaiah post, Kondapuram Mandal, Nellore Dist. 53 years, R/o. Kommi village and ... Appellant/1 Respondent And 1. Gudipati Venkateswarlu, S/o. Ramamah, Hindu, Cultivation, Aged 56 years, R/o. Kommi village, Kondapuram Mandal, Nellore Dist. 2. Gudipati Narayanamma, W/o. Venkateswarlu Aged 53 years, R/o. Kommi village, Kondapuram Mandal, Nellore Dist. 3. Gudipati Sreenivasulu, S/o. Venkateswarlu village, Kondapuram Mandal, Nellore Dist. 4. Gudipati Sesha RaO, S/o. Venkateswarlu, village, Kondapuram Mandal, Nellore Dist. 5. Gudipati Peddamma, W/o Sesha Rao, village, Kondapuram Mandal, Nellore Dist. 6. Gudipati Venkataramanaiah S/o. Sesha Rao Aged 33 years, R/o. Kommi Aged 32 years, R/o. Kommi Aged 29 years, R/o. Kommi Aged 12 years, being a minor rep. by his mother 5^*^ respondent, R/o.Kommi village. Kondapuram Mandal, Nellore Dist. w (The 1^‘ althrough). (Appeal against R4 dismissed for default dt.26/09/2016) respondent is not necessary as he remained exparte vide Court order ... Respondents (The 1st respondent is not necessary as he remained exparte althrough). Counsel for the Appellant: SRI D.RAVINDRA NADH Counsel for the Respondents: SRI V. RAVICHANDRAN The Court made the following: REDDY 9 APHC010204422001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jilirisdiction) ■I [3369] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 519/2001 Between: ...APPELLANT G.subaramaiah AND ...RESPONDENT G Venkateswarlu 5 Ors Counsel for the Appellant: 1.D.RAVINDRA NADH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.VRAVICHANDRAN The Court made the following JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 31.01.2001 passed in A.S.No.23 of 1999 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Kavali, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 22.11.1999 passed in O.S.No.310 of 1988 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kavali. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 1. 2. 3. In the post lunch session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. SD/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The Civil Judge(Senior Division), Kavali. (with records) 2. The Principal Civil Judge(Junior Division), Kavali. (with records) 3. One CC to Sri D.Ravindra Nadh Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri V. Ravichandran, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V. R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 6. Three CD Copies PR ssb I A HIGH COURT DATED:18/02/2025 21) MAR 2025 . Current aecuon ^ ^«4£espATC»5S^ ORDER SA.No.519 of 2001 m- 'X Co. DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS