VIKRAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 2 OTHERS
CRLRD/408/2025 · 2025-08-18
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48054 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 408 of 2025 Revisionist :- Vikram Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ganga Singh,Praveen Kumar Srivastav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. (Order on Criminal Misc. Application for condonation of delay/I.A. No.2 of 2025) Findings the grounds/reasons mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay to be sufficient for condoning the delay, the application for condonation of delay is allowed. The delay in filing the criminal revision is condoned. (Order on the Memo of Criminal Revision)
1. This Criminal Revision under Section 19 (4) of the Family Court Act has been filed against the judgment and order dated 18.04.2025, passed by the Additional Principal Judge-First, Family Court, Raebareli in Criminal Case No.44/2024 (Smt. Geeta Singh and another Vs. Vikram Singh) filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
2. On being asked as to what is the illegality committed by the trial court, Shri Praveen Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist failed to point out any illegality committed by the trial court. Moreover, from the
order impugned it is apparent that to the view of this Court a meager amount of Rs.5,000/- has been provided as an interim maintenance to the opposite party No.2-wife of the revisionist and opposite party No.3-minor daughter born out of the wedlock of the revisionist and opposite party No.2 i.e., Rs.3,000/- + Rs.2,000/- per month respectively.
3. Upon perusal of the affidavit and the grounds taken in the revision as also in view of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Rajnesh Vs. Neha and another (2021) 2 SCC 324, this court finds no force in the revision. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.8.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench