Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15780 (RAJ)

RUCHI BHARATARIYA v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

CW/4309/2018 · 2025-03-10

Avneesh Jhingan, Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10708-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3475/2018 Anoop Bharatariya Chairman Cum Managing Director, World Trade Park, Jln Marg, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur. ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3474/2018 Ruchi Bharatariya, Director World Trade Park, Jln Marg, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur. ----Respondent D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3476/2018 World Trade Park Ltd. Jln Marg, Jaipur Through Shri Anoop Bharatariya Chairnam Cum Managing Directo ----Petitioner Versus The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur. ----Respondent D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4309/2018 Ruchi Bharatariya, Director, M/s World Trade Park, Jln Marg, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Tds Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur ----Respondent D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4329/2018 Anoop Bharatariya, Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, M/s World [2025:RJ-JP:10708-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-3475/2018] Trade Park Ltd., Jln Marg, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Tds, Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dileep Shivpuri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shantanu Sharma with Mr. Aditya Doda Mr. Parth Vasistha HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 10/03/2025 Learned counsel for respondent on instructions received from the department submits that till date prosecution has not been initiated. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners is not pressing these petitions with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, in case need so arises. The petitions are dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Chandan/Deepa-23-27