Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15780 (JHR)

KHURSHID ALAM ALIAS RAJU MIRDAHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3037/2025 · 2025-06-05

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:14537 ) Page-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3037 of 2025 Khurshid Alam @ Raju Mirdaha, aged about 41 years, Son of Md. Heyat Mirdaha, resident of Village- Patratu, P.O.- Lohardaga, P.S.- Bagru, District- Lohardaga. .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P. --------- Order No. 02/Dated: 05th June, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail from apprehending his arrest in connection with Bagru P.S. Case No. 03 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 132, 324(3), 109, 62 and 3(5) of B.N.S. Act, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case, only the basis of suspicion. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he was also not apprehended from the place of occurrence. He further submits that alleged pick-up Van bearing registration No.-JH-01FE-3793 and the Royal Enfield motorcycle do not belong to the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He further submits that petitioner is sole breadwinner of his family. Co-accused has been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.05.2025 passed in A.B.A. No. 2892 of 2025. As such, he may be extended the privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to extend privilege of anticipatory bail to this petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of ( 2025:JHHC:14537 ) Page-2 Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga. 6. It is made clear that petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation / trial. If the petitioner will not co-operate with the investigation / trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Simran-Aditi/