VIKAS YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/7575/2025 · 2025-08-14
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157790 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157790 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47645 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7575 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikas Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin./Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Pratap Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as Sri Satyendra Srivastava, the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.08 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Jethwara, District Pratapgarh. 3. Although a copy of the gang chart has not been annexed with the application, the same has been produced by the learned A.G.A. and a perusal of the same shows involvement of the applicant in a solitary case, in which he has been granted bail. In para-15 of the affidavit, the applicant's involvement in two other criminal cases has been disclosed, in both of which he has been enlarged on bail. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he
could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the solitary case mentioned in the gang-chart and in the other cases in which he is involved and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 04.07.2025 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8.
Let the applicant- Vikas Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 14.8.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench