Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48144 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4897 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Gaytri Devi Respondent :- Tehsildar Milkypur, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Prasad Mishra,Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar, Milkypur, Ayodhya, District Ayodhya, to decide the Mutation Proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 vide Case No.2976 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202504230402976) Smt. Gayatri Devi vs. Smt. Bhana Devi) along with the pending recall application, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Tehsildar, Milkypur, Ayodhya, District Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid Mutation Proceeding along with the pending recall application in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Mutation Proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 vide Case No.2976 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202504230402976) Smt. Gayatri Devi vs. Smt. Bhana Devi) along with the pending recall application, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 18.8.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench