( 2025:JHHC:15884 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4632 of 2025 ------ Sumit Kumar Poddar @ Sumit Kumar @ Firangi @ Furri aged about 28 years son of Shashi Poddar, resident of Sanjay Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Ratu, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dharmendra Kr. Malityar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted Rs.35,000/- and one mobile phone. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner was identified by the victims in the T.I. Parade held inside the jail. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.02.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has been identified in T.I. Parade; there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail. It is therefore submitted that the petitioner ought not be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner and also considering the fact that he has been identified in T.I. Parade and the chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/