SMT. KALAWATI v. TAHSILDAR (JUDICIAL), TAHSIL TANDA, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND ANOTHER
A227/4876/2025 · 2025-08-14
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157745 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157745 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47862 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4876 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Kalawati Respondent :- Tahsildar (Judicial), Tahsil Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyam Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is typographical error in the prayer clause, where appeal may be permitted to be substituted to the mutation. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary amendment/ substitution in the prayer clause, during the course of the day. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 5. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent, is dispensed with. 6. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the opposite party no.1 to decide the the Case No. 4072/2025 Computerized Case No. T202504040304072 Ram Sahay Versus Smt. Kalawati, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending before the opposite party no.1, in the interest of justice. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 8. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar is desired to make all endeavor to decide the the Case No. 4072/2025 Computerized
Case No. T202504040304072 Ram Sahay Versus Smt. Kalawati, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 10. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 11.
With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 14.8.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench