Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157726 (ALL)

ANKIT PASI @ SANTOSH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/7559/2025 · 2025-08-13

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47613 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7559 of 2025 Applicant :- Ankit Pasi @ Santosh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Shri Bharat Kumar Dixit, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Manish Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.205 of 2025, under Sections 2/3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Mohanganj, District Amethi. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in three cases. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that out of the three cases mentioned in the gang chart, in one case the applicant has been granted bail; in the other case, he has been granted anticipatory bail and in the third case, he has not been arrested and has only been issued notice under Section 41-A and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 11.07.2025 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Ankit Pasi @ Santosh be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench