Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15772 (JHR)

RAJAPAL ALIAS BANGALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5390/2025 · 2025-07-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:17816] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5390 of 2025 ------ Rajapal @ Bangali, aged about 30 years, son of Nirmal Pal, resident of G. Type, Panchmandir, Road No. 33, P.O. and P.S. Patratu, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 03-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection S.T. Case No.05 of 2025 arising out of Barkagaon P.S. Case No.219 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was engaged in the business of stolen motorcycles and used to sell the same at lesser price. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that except the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is no material to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.01.2024 passed in B.A. No.9407 of 2023. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.10.2024 as is evident from para-20 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Hazaribagh in connection with S.T. Case No.05 of 2025 arising out of Barkagaon P.S. Case No.219 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/