ANSHU KUMAR PANDEY v. MR. SURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI, SECY. BASIC EDUCATION BOARD U.P., PRAYAGRAJ
CAPL/3537/2024 · 2025-03-27
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157700 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157700 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:17638 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3537 of 2024 Applicant :- Anshu Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- Mr. Surendra Kumar Tiwari, Secy. Basic Education Board U.P., Prayagraj Counsel for Applicant :- I.M. Pandey Ist,Shivam Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ran Vijay Singh,Jyoti Prakash Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Sri Ran Vijay Singh, Advocate appearing for the respondent has placed an order dated 23/24.09.2024 passed by the respondent on the representation of the applicant, which is taken on record. Sri Ran Vijay Singh submits that the order of the writ Court has already been complied with.
2. Copy of the aforesaid order is also provided to learned counsel for the applicant.
3. Considering the contents of the order passed by the writ Court as well as the aforesaid order placed before this Court, this Court is of the view that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed.
4. However, it is open to the applicant to take appropriate remedy, if he is feeling aggrieved with the order passed by the respondent. Order Date :- 27.3.2025 Arpan Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench