IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE 01 19.8.2025 Sc Ct. no.2 WPA 6923 OF 2024 ------------- Sri Kunal Bhadra Vs. The Union of India & Ors. Mr. Shamik Chatterjee Mr. Aditya Bikram Mahata Mr. Sahil Kabir. ….For the Petitioner Ms. Chandreyi Alam Ms. Runu Mukherjee. ….For the UOI Mr. Shamik Chatterjee, learned Counsel appears for the petitioner. Ms. Chandreyi Alam, learned Counsel appears for the respondents Union of India. Today the writ petition appears under the heading “To Be Mentioned” for a typographical insertion by way of correction in the order dated August 11, 2025 which has been omitted mistakenly, as would be apparent from record. By consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the first line at the second page of the order dated August 11, 2025 shall include the expression “Annexure P-3 at page 25 along with Annexure P-6 at page 32 to the writ petition”. 2 The above correction incorporated by consent of the parties shall also be read into and incorporated in the order dated August 11, 2025. The rest of the order remains unaltered and without any modification. It is clarified that, the consent given by the learned Counsel for the Union of India is restricted for the typographical correction only. (Aniruddha Roy, J.)