SHYAM KUMAR SAINI v. DISTRICT JUDGE RAEBARELI and 4 OTHERS
WRIA/22580/2017 · 2025-05-05
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26062
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22580 of 2017 Petitioner :- Shyam Kumar Saini Respondent :- District Judge Raebareli And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.R. Singh,Girish Chandra Sinha,Upendra Bahadur Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Raj Kr. Bajpai, Bireshwar Nath, Lalit Shukla Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 21.08.2008 passed by the SCC Court as well as the order dated 31.05.2017 whereby the revision was dismissed.
3. The counsel for the petitioner argues that the notice did not fix the time as prescribed. Both the courts have recorded the finding of fact against the petitioner which cannot be interfered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
4. The writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
5. The petitioner is granted six months' time to vacate the premises subject to the petitioner executing an affidavit in the form of an undertaking within a period two weeks from today that he will vacate the premises and shall handover the vacant and physical possession to the landlord and no one else.
6. In case of failure to file such an undertaking, the benefit of this order shall come to an end and the order shall be executed forthwith.
7. Let a copy of this order be sent to the executing court for compliance. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench