MANSOOR AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1028/2025 · 2025-08-14
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157667 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157667 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47958 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1028 of 2025 Applicant :- Mansoor Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Pheran Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Anupam Dwivedi, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shekhar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 0116 of 2025, under Section 3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Tulsipur, District Balrampur.
3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in a solitary case, in which he has been granted bail. Two other cases have been disclosed in paragraph 12 of the affidavit filed in support of the application, in one of which he has not been summoned till date and the other case stands closed after imposing fine of Rs. 1500/- on the applicant. The applicant's involvement in yet another case has been disclosed in the supplementary affidavit in which the Investigating Officer has submitted a closure report.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the
applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang.
5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.
6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in solitary case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid
facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
8. Let the applicant-Mansoor Ahmad be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court.
Order Date :- 14.8.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench