Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2715 WP No. 6536 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6536 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SHARIYA ANJUM D/O S.RAFIQ, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT 25-67, RANGAPURAM, PALAMNER CHITTOR, ANDRA PRADESH-517 408. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
RAJESH PRASAD YADAV @ CHOOTU S/O VASUDEVA YADAV, AGED 20 YEARS, R/AT: GURUCHAK GRAMA, NARAHAT POLICE THANA JURISDICTION, NAVADA DISTRICT, BIHAR STATE-805 122.
2.
SUPERINTENDENT OF BANGALORE CENTRAL PRISON, BANGALORE-560 100. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2715 WP No. 6536 of 2020
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.2 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the Writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of January
2025. The petition is pending from five years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 30