1 2025:CGHC:15568 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 318 of 2025 • Jagjeet Singh, S/o Shri Harbansh Singh Arora, Aged About 47 Years, R/o House No.158, New Khursipar, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1. Smt. Derhin Bai, W/o Late Sone Lal Nishad, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Borsi, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Ravi Kumar Nishad, S/o Late Sone Lal Nishad, Aged About 14 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Derhin Bai W/o Late Sone Lal Nishad Respondent No.1, R/o Village Borsi, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Ku. Rajeshwari, D/o Sone Lal Nishad, Aged About 12 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Derhin Bai W/o Late Sone Lal Nishad Respondent No.1, R/o Village Borsi, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Smt. Sonbati, W/o Late Konde Singh Nishad, Aged About 65 Years, Mother Of Deceased, R/o Village Borsi, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Behind Anand Talkies, Moudahapara, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of Vehicle No. C.G. 04 J- 0658). 6. Loknath, S/o Radheshyam Sahu, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Borsi, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Vehicle No. C.G. 04 J- 3709). 7. Umesh Kurre, S/o Shri Isdhar Kurre, Aged About 35 Years, Permanent R/o Village Borsi, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Owner Of Vehicle No. C.G. 04 J- 3709). 8. Branch Manager, The New India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office No. 2, Commercial Complex, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of Vehicle No. C.G. 04 J- 3709). 9. Jeevan Lal Sahu, S/o Jai Lal Sahu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Sadak, Parsuli, P.S. Gariyaband, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA 2 For Applicant : Mr. P. Chetan Kumar, Advocate. For Respondents : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 03/04/2025 1. Heard on M.C.C., application for restoration of MA No.122/2017, which was dismissed vide order dated 22.03.2025 for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that on 22.03.2025, counsel appearing for the applicant met with minor accident, thus, he could not appear when the case was taken up for hearing, therefore, the same was dismissed for want of prosecution. Hence, the said mistake was bonafide and the applicant wants to contest the case on merits, thus the instant MCC may be allowed. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, which is well supported by an affidavit, instant MCC is hereby allowed. 4. Registry is directed to restore MA No.122/2017 {Jagjeet Singh Versus Smt. Derhin Bai & Others} in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge