VIJAY NATH @ VIJAY NATH TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A483/639/2025 · 2025-08-18
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157628 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157628 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48039 Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 639 of 2025 Applicant :- Vijay Nath @ Vijay Nath Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Court No.20, Sultanpur to decide the Complaint Case No.7047/2023 "Vijay Nath Tewari Vs. Smt. Anita & others" Under Section 504, 506, 120B IPC in respect of opposite party no.2&3 and Section 494 IPC in respect of opposite party no.4, Police Station Bazar Shukul, District Amethi at earliest, preferably within a period of six months in the ends of justice." Considering the facts as stated, particularly the period of pendency of the case, which appears to be pending since 2023, this petition is disposed of with direction to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Court No.20, Sultanpur, to consider and decide the pending case in issue, quoted in the prayer clause, most expeditiously. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench