AYODHYA PRASAD DUBE v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, MUSAFIRKHANA, AMETHI AND OTHERS
A227/4893/2025 · 2025-08-18
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157594 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157594 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48137 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4893 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ayodhya Prasad Dube Respondent :- Consolidation Officer, Musafirkhana, Amethi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Musafirkhana, District Amethi, to decide the Case No.3634 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.202554047150023634) "Ram Bahadur vs. Shankar and others", under Rule 109(A)(1) of Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Rules, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Musafirkhana, District Amethi, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Case No.3634 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.202554047150023634)
"Ram Bahadur vs. Shankar and others", under Rule 109(A)(1) of Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Rules, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 18.8.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench