- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13559 WP No. 2938 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 2938 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 2. SRI.B.N.ANAND S/O.LATE. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT BHUVANAHALLI VILLAGE SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK PIN-562114 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANIKANTA H B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE TAHASILDAR HOSKOTE TALUK HOSKOTE 562114 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH.K., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE R-2 TAHSILDAR TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED. Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13559 WP No. 2938 of 2025 27.08.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-A FOR TRANSFER OF KHATHA WITH RESPECT TO LAND IN SY.NO. 43 BLOCK NO.8 MEASURING 4 ACRES SITUATED AT BHUVANAHALLI VILLAGE, SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this Writ Petition is to direct the Thasildar to consider the representation dated 27.08.2024 submitted by the petitioner, whereby the petitioner sought for transfer of katha in respect of land bearing Sy.No.43, Block No.8 measuring 4 acres situated at Bhuvanahalli village, Sulibele Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore Rural District. 2. Learned High Court Government Pleader places on record a Memo and enclosed a copy of the endorsement dated 20.03.2025 by which the request of the petitioner was considered and rejected. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13559 WP No. 2938 of 2025 3. In the light of the above, the prayer made in this Writ Petition would not survive for consideration and Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as having become unnecessary. 4. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement dated 20.03.2025 in accordance with law, if so advised. 5. It is needless to state that all contentions are left open. 6. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19