NARENDER KUMAR SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI RAMCHANDR SHARMA v. RAMGOPAL S/O LATE SHRI KANHYALAL JI SHARMA
CW/6692/2025 · 2025-05-13
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15758 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15758 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20135] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6692/2025 Narender Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Ramchandr Sharma, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 828 Shivaji Nagar, Civil Line, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. Ramgopal S/o Late Shri Kanhyalal Ji Sharma, Aged About 90 Years, Resident Of 827 Shivaji Nagar, Civil Line, Thana Sodala, Jaipur
2. Badrinarayan Sharma S/o Late Shri Phoolchand Ji Sharma, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of 827 Shivaji Nagar, Civil Line, Thana Sodala, Jaipur
3. Hariprasad S/o Late Shri Phoolchand, Resident Of 827 Shivaji Nagar, Civil Line, Thana Sodala, Jaipur
4. Jagdish S/o Late Shri Phoolchand, Resident Of 827 Shivaji Nagar, Civil Line, Thana Sodala, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yunus Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 13/05/2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the
order dated 17.02.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate No.3, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur, in Temporary Injunction (T.I.) Application No.10/2025 and against the order dated 29.03.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge No.5, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur, in Civil Misc. Appeal No.01/2025 (CIS No.16/2025).
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Trial Court, without justifying any cogent reason, has granted ad- interim relief in favour of the respondent(s) vide order dated
17.02.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the next date
[2025:RJ-JP:20135] (2 of 2) [CW-6692/2025] before the learned Trial Court in Temporary Injunction Application, is already fixed for 14.05.2025.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present writ petition with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the aforesaid pending T.I. Application as expeditiously as possible.
4. Permission, as sought for, is granted.
5. The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
6. Looking to the overall facts & circumstances of the case and the submissions made at bar, the learned Trial Court is directed to dispose of the aforesaid Temporary Injunction Application, after hearing both the parties, within a period of one month from today in accordance with law.
7. A copy of this order be supplied to learned Trial Court via E- mail for further information & necessary compliance.
8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /19