Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47637 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9064 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Sushila Respondent :- Nagar Ayukt ( Municipal Commissioner ) Nagar Nigam Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- Namit Sharma Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Akbar Ahmad learned counsel who has filed his vakalatnama today on behalf of respondents no. 1 and 2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The petitioner is before this Court claiming the arrears of difference of salary in terms of 7th Pay Commission from 01.01.2016 to February 2019 as well as arrears of ACP. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.1 i.e. Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam, Lucknow which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.1 then respondent no.1 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of three months from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench