SANDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/882/2025 · 2025-08-13
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157566 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157566 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47266 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 882 of 2025 Revisionist :- Sandeep Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Satish Singh,Himanshu Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Shri Satish Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and Shri V.K.Shahi, learned AGA-I for the State. By means of the present revision under Section 19(4) of Family Court Act, 1984 (in short "Act of 1984"), the revisionist has impeached the order dated 03.06.2025 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.1, Gonda (in short
"Family Court') in Criminal Misc. Case no. 183/2024 (CNR No.UPGD020003512024) (Sandeep Kumar Vs. Smt. Sandhaya Kumari). Vide impugned order dated 03.06.2025, the Family Court rejected the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the application to recall the order dated 28.11.2022 passed on application dated 16.08.2021 preferred by the revisionist, under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. which was filed to recall the final order dated 11.09.2019. From the facts as culled out from the impugned order are as under :- (i) A case i.e. Case No. 157/2018 ( Smt. Sandhaya Kumari Vs. Sandeep Kumar) was allowed on 11.09.2019. (ii) Alleging that the final order dated 11.09.2019 is an ex-parte
order, a highly belated application dated 16.08.2021 was filed in terms of Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. with a prayer to recall the final order dated 11.09.2019. (iii) The application dated 16.08.2021, under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C., preferred by the revisionist was dismissed for want of prosecution on 28.11.2022. (iv) For the purposes of recalling the order dated 28.11.2022 whereby the application dated 16.08.2021, under Section 126(2)
Cr.P.C., preferred by the revisionist was dismissed, the revisionist filed an application alongwith an application seeking condonation of delay on 14.02.2024. (v) From the record as also the submissions advanced by
learned counsel for the revisionist, it further appears that till date a single penny has not been provided to opposite party no.2 by the revisionist. (vi) According to the final order, the revisionist is under obligation to pay Rs.3,000/- per month from the date of preferring the application before the Family Court by the opposite party no.2 i.e. 09.04.2018. Thus, the total amount till date comes to around Rs.2,64,000/-. Considered the aforesaid as also the observation made by the Family Court in the order dated 03.06.2025 whereby the application under Section 5 of Limitation Act as also the application with a prayer to recall the order dated 28.11.2024 whereby the application under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want to prosecution has been rejected, which reads as under :-
"
पपरर कक ववदपन वपदवमत दपरप बहस कक समय पपरर ससददप कक मपर कक वचवकतसदय पपतत
कक छपयपपवतयपस नयपयपलय कक अवललकनपरर पसतकत वकयप गयप,
वकनतक उनहह पतपवलद मह
ससलग नहह वकयप गयप हह। उन पपतत कक अवललकन सक यह सपष हल रहप हह वक वदनपसक 23.02.2010
कल पपरर हललद फह वमलद हहससपटल मह भतर हहआ रप और वदनपसक 26.02.2010
कल वडसचपरर हहआ रप। इसद पकपर वह गलमतद हपससपटल नपकप अयलधयप मह
वदनपसक 16.06.2022
कल भतर हहआ रप और वदनपसक 19.06.2022
वडसचपरर हहआ रप।
इस पकपर यवद पपरर ववदपन वपदवमत दपरप पसतकत उक पपतत पर ववशवपस भद वकयप रपवक
तल भद वदनपसक 28.11.2022
सक लककर 14.02.2024
तकक कक अवधध कक ववलमब कप कलई
सपषदकरण पपरर दपरप नहह वदयप गयप हह। यह भद धयपन दकनक यलगय तथय हह वक वदनपसक 11.09.2019
कल वपद ससखयप-157/2018
एकपकदय रप सक वनणरत वकयप गयप रप तब सक
लककर आर तक पपरर ससददप कक मपर दपरप ववपकद ससधयप कल कलई धनरपवश पदपन कक गयद
हल ऐसप कलई पपत पतपवलद पर नहह हह। इस पकपर यह सपष हल रहप हह वक पपरर दपरप
नयपवयक पवकयप कप दकरपयलग वकयप रप रहप हह।
मपमलक कक तथय एवस पररससरवतयत कल दकखतक हहए पपररनप-
पत 9
ख वनरसत वकयप रपनक यलगय हह।" It would be apt to indicate at this stage that as to whether the proper explanation was given in the application seeking condonation of delay, the revisionist ought to have brought on record the copy of the said application but the same has not been placed on record. Upon due consideration of aforesaid, the revision is dismissed. A copy of this order be sent to Family Court forthwith.
Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench