Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157530 (ALL)

COMPLAINANT OF CASE CRIME NO.-185/2025 PS DARGAH SHARIF, DISTT. BAHRAICH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/7451/2025 · 2025-08-27

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7451 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1.. Heard Sri Ashutosh Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.N.Tilhari, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite parties No. 4 & 5 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of0 Mandamus commanding to opposite parties specially opposite party No. 2 and 3 to conduct fair and proper investigation of case Crime No.0185/2025 under Sections 70(1), 309(4), 115(2), 351(3) of B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(v) S.C. /S.T. Act, Police Station Dargah Sharif, District Bahraich and arrest the accused persons, contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to opposite parties specially opposite party No.2 to transfer the investigation to any other agencies/police station regarding Case Crime No.0185/2025 under Sections 70(1), 309(4), 115(2), 351(3) of B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(v) S.C. /S.T. Act, Police Station Dargah Sharif, District Bahraich." 4. Sri Tilhari has informed the Court on the basis of specific instructions Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Complainant Of Case Crime No.-185/2025 Ps Dargah Sharif, Distt. Bahraich .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) that after completion of the investigation final report has been filed on 19.08.2025. He has further submitted that the petitioner may file protest application before the court concerned or may take any other remedy permissible under the law but the prayers prayed in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to the record. However, it is always open for the petitioner to take appropriate remedy before the appropriate court concerned. August 27, 2025 Reena/- CRLP No. 7451 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench