Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15753 (ALL)

SAMAR JEET v. PACSHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/1537/2025 · 2025-02-07

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:17953 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1537 of 2025 Petitioner :- Samar Jeet Respondent :- Pacshimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manu Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Brajesh Pratap Singh,Jitendra Sarin Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Manu Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Jitendra Sarin learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4, Shri Brajesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and 2. The petitioner has been suspended on the footing that a departmental enquiry is contemplated against him for various charges including that of demanding illegal gratification. No interference is warranted in the impugned order of suspension. Faced with this, Shri Manu Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner recasts his relief and submits that the inquiry proceedings may be concluded in a stipulated period of time. Shri Brajesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and 2 and Shri Jitendra Sarin learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 contend that the endeavour of the authorities is to conclude the inquiry proceedings in an expeditious time frame. In wake of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, interest of justice will be served by directing the disciplinary authority to conclude the inquiry proceedings within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to cooperate in the inquiry proceedings. With the aforesaid direction the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Dhananjai Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad