Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157524 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/7440/2025 · 2025-09-01

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7440 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Avneesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned AGA for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 7. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties specially police authorities to take an appropriate decision on the application dated 16.07.2025 moved by the petitioner (ANNEXURE No. 1) pending before him forthwith in the interest of justice. (ii) To issue a writ order, direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2&3 consider and decide the application dated 16.07.2025 in light of Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & ors. (iii) To issue a writ order writ of mandamus or appropriate direction to restrain the police authorities from taking any coercive action or eviction measures against the petitioner in respect of the property in question." 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition at this stage and liberty may be given to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. 4. It is needless to say that if any person is aggrieved from any action/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avneesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Om Prakash Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) inaction of the authorities concerned, he/she may approach the competent authority for redressal of his/ her grievance; for that, no liberty is required. However, the reliefs prayed in this petition may not be granted. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is consigned to record. September 1, 2025 RBS/- CRLP No. 7440 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench