Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15750 (UTT)

SANJAY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1896/2025 · 2025-10-30

Rakesh Thapliyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9583 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 / 1 8 9 6 / 2 0 2 5 Hon 'ble Rak esh Th apliyal, J. 1. Mr. S.R.S. Gill, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant Sanjay, S/ o Satpal is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 25.09.2025, bearing FIR/ Case Crime No. 802 of 2024, registered at P.S. Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 103(1), 109 (1), 115(2), 191(2), 190, 193(3), 351(2) and 352 of BNS 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR and there is no evidence against him. He further submits that present applicant is languishing in jail since 18.03.2025, and, thereafter, charge sheet has been filed on 08.05.2025. He further argued that other co-accused, namely, Aditya, Susheel, Saurav and Joginder have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and the present applicant claims parity. 5. On the other side, Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State also submits that no specific role with regard to the assault has been assigned to the applicant, though, he has been charge sheeted and also submits that applicant deserves for the benefit of parity of the other co-accused who have been granted bail. 6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that charge sheet has already been filed and other co-accused 2025:UHC:9583 have already been enlarged on bail, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Sanjay be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. ( Rak esh Th apliy al, J.) 3 0 .1 0 .2 02 5 Parul 2025:UHC:9583