Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1575 (GUJ)

TANVI W/O TUSHARBHAI CHAUHAN AND D/O RAJESHBHAI GOVINDBHAI PARMAR v. TUSHAR GAJENDRABHAI CHAUHAN

FA/3615/2025 · 2026-07-27

Ilesh J Vora, R T Vachhani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C/FA/3615/2025 ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3615 of 2025 ========================================================== TANVI W/O TUSHARBHAI CHAUHAN AND D/O RAJESHBHAI GOVINDBHAI PARMAR Versus TUSHAR GAJENDRABHAI CHAUHAN ========================================================== Appearance: MR. BHAVIK P SHAH(6391) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR HITESH L GUPTA(3937) for the Defendant(s) No. 1 MR NAYAN L GUPTA(11798) for the Defendant(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI Date : 27/07/2026 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA) 1. We have heard learned counsel Mr. Bhavik Shah and Mr. Hitesh Gupta and Nayan Gupta for the respective parties. 2. This Appeal is directed against the interim order with respect to custody of the child passed on 11.09.2024 by the Family Court, Vadodara, whereby, the prayer of the appellant – mother came to be partly allowed. The appellant mother, as interim measure, granted visitation right of the child. 3. Mr. Bhavik Shah, learned advocate for the appellant – C/FA/3615/2025 ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026 mother has submitted that, it is difficult for the mother to meet both the child at Vadodara and considering the conduct of the respondent husband, the order of visitation, is paper order. 4. On the other hand, Mr. Hitesh Gupta, learned advocate for the respondent has submitted that, the main application is pending before the Family Court and same can be disposed of by issuing necessary direction. He also agreed to change the place of visitation of both the child. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the present case, we deem it fit to change the place of visitation. We modified the interim order to the effect that, the respondent father shall bring both the child on the first working Saturday in the month between 3-00 to 5-00 pm at the Children Room, Family Court, Ahmedabad to meet the appellant mother. The appellant mother shall remain present on the above place. The respondent father is directed to see that mother can meet once in a month at the place and time mentioned hereinabove. 6. In view of the above, the Family Court, Vadodara is directed to disposed of the application being CMA No. 39 of 2023, as far as possible expeditiously C/FA/3615/2025 ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026 within period of 6 months from the receipt of this order. 7. In view of the aforesaid direction and observation, the appeal stands disposed of. The change of place for visitation right having been made with a view to maintain cordial relationship between the parties. The Family Court, Vadodara shall decide the application independently on its own merits and in accordance with law. (ILESH J. VORA,J) (R. T. VACHHANI, J) P.S. JOSHI Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/07/2026 17:44:26