Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15749 (CHH)

SATPAL SINGH SALUJA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1983/2022 · 2025-04-03

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15699 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1983 of 2022 1 - Satpal Singh Saluja S/o Late Devendra Singh Saluja, Aged About 50 Years R/o Behind Tahsil Office, Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Information Commissioner, C.G. State Information Commission, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Cum First Appellate Authority Under Rti Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 4 - The Tahsildar, Manendragarh, District Korea (Chhattisgarh), District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Mehta, Advocate For State : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Shyam Sundar Lal Tekchandani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 03.04.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the instant petition may kindly be disposed of as this petition has become infructuous due to dismissal of the appeal by the appellate authority on 15.03.2022. 2. Prayer is allowed. BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.04.04 10:33:41 +0530 2 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. However the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order passed by the appellate authority taking recourse to the remedy available to him under the law. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika