922-CA-3400-2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3400 OF 2023 IN FAST/12060/2020 Rahimkha Husainkha Thr Its Gpa Shadulabee Rashimkha Pathan And Anr. ….Applicants VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Thr Dist. Collector, Nanded And Ors. …..Respondents ….. Mr. Tushar Nagarkar h/f Mr. Nagarkar Kiran M., Advocate for Applicants Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Ms. Vaishali S. Swami h/f Mr. Mahesh C. Swami, Advocate for Respondent No.3 ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 09.04.2025 PER COURT : 1. This is an Application fled by the Original Claimants for condonation of 223 days delay caused in preferring the First Appeal. 2. The learned Advocate for the Applicants – Claimants submits that, suffcient reasons are shown in the Application for not preferring the Appeal within the prescribed time. Hence, the Application be allowed. 3. The Application is opposed by the learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned Advocate Ms. Vaishali for 1 2025:BHC-AUG:10817 922-CA-3400-2023.odt Respondent No.3. They submit that, no suffcient reasons are shown in the Application. They further submit that, Application be rejected. 4. After hearing both the sides and for the reasons mentioned in Paragraph Nos.6, 7 and 8 of the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause - ‘B’ subject to the condition that, the Applicants / Appellants shall not be entitled for the statutory benefts and the interest for the aforesaid delayed period. Appeal be registered. The copy of this order be kept in the order sheet of the Appeal Memo. 5. Civil Application stands disposed off accordingly. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/April-2025 2 Signed by: Md. Sameer Q. Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/04/2025 11:56:49