M/S M.K. ENTERPRISES THRU. PROPRIETOR ARUN MANSUKHANI v. ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE COURT NO. 9, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A227/4253/2024 · 2025-07-07
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157485 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157485 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38379 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4253 of 2024 Petitioner :- M/S M.K. Enterprises Thru. Proprietor Arun Mansukhani Respondent :- Addl. District Judge Court No. 9, Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Tripathi,Saud Rais Counsel for Respondent :- Aakchad Nath,Nirmit Srivastava Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call. Shri Saud Rais, learned counsel for the petitioner has sent an illness slip. However, the other counsel is also not present.
2. Considering the fact that the decree of eviction has been passed and has been affirmed by the appellate court, the suit was of the year 2014 and on perusal of the two judgements, no reason appears to entertain the matter.
3. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench