2025:JHHC:14672 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4548 of 2025 ---- Raju Kumar Verma @ Raju Kumar Sharma, aged about 22 years, son of Late Krishna Verma, Resident of Gumti Basti, Post Adityapur, Police Station Adityapur, District – Seraikella Kharsawan. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 05th June, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner who is in custody since 11.03.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.75 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. He is a daily wage labourer and there is no criminal antecedent against him. Further, undertaking has been given by him for participation in the trial and he is ready to abide by every condition imposed as by this Court. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.75 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amar/- Uploaded