Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157438 (ALL)

MOHD. AYAJ @ ARMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO.

BAIL/7494/2025 · 2025-08-12

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46990 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7494 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohd. Ayaj @ Arman Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Arti Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Ms. Arti Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0168 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 (1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Chanda, District Sultanpur. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in one case only, in which he has been granted bail. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that a co-accused person- Irfan, has been granted anticipatory bail by means of an order dated 11.06.2025 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 624 of 2025. 6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in a solitary case and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.07.2025 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Mohd. Ayaj @ Arman be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench