Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157436 (ALL)

NAINA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/7391/2025 · 2025-08-27

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7391 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Kushagra Kanodia, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order being passed, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that FIR has been lodged against petitioners,therefore, this petition has been rendered infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further requested that he may be given liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the FIR. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed being infructuous with the aforesaid liberty. August 27, 2025 dk/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kushagra Kanodia, Akhilesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Naina Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Affairs Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench