ASHRAF ALI @ ASHRAF v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/7611/2025 · 2025-08-14
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47955 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7611 of 2025 Applicant :- Ashraf Ali @ Ashraf Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Diwakar Goyal,Sudhaker Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Sudhaker Prakash, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Ms. Shikha Sinha, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 0031 of 2025, under Sections 74 BNS, 9M/10 POCSO Act, Police Station Madeyganj, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 23.02.2025 alleging that the applicant does obscene activities with the informant's daughter aged 6 years. The informant's daughter has supported the FIR allegation in her statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 18 years having no previous criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. A compromise entered into between the informant and the applicant's mother has been annexed with the bail application wherein it is recorded that after the applicant was taken into custody his mother has fallen ill and now with the intervention of the some persons, the parties have entered into a compromise. 6. Learned AGA-I has opposed the bail application and she has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on
16.04.2025. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is a
young man aged 18 years having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 23.02.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded and the offences alleged carry maximum punishment of imprisonment up to seven years, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicant-Ashraf Ali @ Ashraf be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench