Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47649 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9051 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Development Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Patel,Sandeep Sharma Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, Sri Anagh Shukla, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2, and Sri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.3 and 4. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that an inquiry is pending against the petitioner and has not been finalized with the result that the respondents have also not granted the benefit of selection grade and time scale from the date the petitioner has completed 8 years and 14 years service. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.4 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.4 then respondent no.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench